How is the modern education system cheating its own students?
Edition 12: Reading skills never get measured directly!
Every subject in school depends on reading.
Science. History. Mathematics. Literature. Geography. Law. Medicine.
There is not a single discipline that does not require a student to
read.
And yet, in all the years a student spends in formal education, their
reading skills are rarely directly measured.
We measure what they read. We never measure how well they actually read.
This is not a minor oversight.
It is a foundational failure – one that quietly undermines everything
else the system attempts to build.
What reading actually is:
We have reduced reading to a mechanical act, where the eyes move across
a page, words being decoded.
But reading, done properly, is one of the most complex and demanding
cognitive activities a human being performs.
It is the engine behind almost every higher function the mind is capable
of.
Consider what genuine reading skill enables:
It makes us effective at:
Knowing - building an accurate picture of the world from text.
Learning - absorbing new concepts and integrating them with what we already
understand.
Remembering - encoding what we read in ways that make it retrievable.
Judging and evaluating - weighing what we read against evidence and
prior understanding.
Reasoning and thinking - following complex arguments and constructing our
own.
Communicating - because how clearly we express ourselves is inseparable from how
clearly we have read and understood.
Decision-making and problem-solving - because most
real decisions begin with reading something that demands to be understood
correctly.
Reading is not a subject. It is the infrastructure on which every
subject stands.
And underneath all of these functions, five specific cognitive processes
make reading genuinely effective:
Knowing what is read - not assuming comprehension, but verifying
it. Most readers move forward through text without checking whether genuine
understanding has occurred. They reach the end of a page and realise, honestly,
that they absorbed very little of it. This is not a concentration problem. It
is a skill gap.
Aligning reading speed with the brain's processing capacity - one of
the most overlooked dimensions of reading skill. Every reader has a pace at
which they can genuinely process meaning. Read faster than that pace, and
comprehension collapses while the illusion of reading continues. Read slower
than necessary, and efficiency suffers without benefit. The skill lies in
finding and maintaining the pace at which reading and understanding move
together - and this pace changes depending on the complexity of the material.
Filtering out unnecessary information - not everything on a page
deserves equal cognitive attention. A skilled reader distinguishes
automatically between what is central and what is peripheral, between what must
be retained and what can be released. An unskilled reader gives equal weight to
everything - and retains very little as a result, overwhelmed by the
undifferentiated volume of it.
Directing memory and concentration - skilled reading is an
active, not a passive, process. It requires the conscious direction of
attention toward what matters, and the deliberate use of memory to connect what
is being read now with what was read before. Without this direction, reading
becomes a surface activity - words are processed, but meaning is not
constructed.
Regulating information processing - knowing when to slow
down, when to re-read, when to pause and reflect, and when to move forward.
This is the metacognitive layer of reading - the reader monitoring their own
comprehension in real time and adjusting their approach accordingly. It is the
difference between a reader who finishes a difficult text understanding it and
one who finishes it having merely completed it.
What the system does instead: Reading is taught
intensively in the earliest years of school - phonics, decoding, basic
comprehension - and then largely abandoned as a direct subject of instruction.
From that point forward, the system assumes that because a student can decode
text, they can read. And so reading becomes invisible - the assumed medium
through which all other learning happens, never examined, never developed,
never measured on its own terms.
The consequences are invisible too - at first.
The real-world consequence: Students advance through
grades, through secondary school, through university - without their
foundational reading skill ever having been directly assessed or deliberately
developed beyond its earliest, most basic form.
A student who cannot read with genuine comprehension but who is
intelligent and resourceful will find ways to compensate - memorising key
points from summaries, relying on class notes, absorbing information through
listening rather than reading. They will pass examinations. They will graduate.
And they will carry an underdeveloped reading skill into every subsequent
environment - professional, personal, intellectual - where complex reading is
required.
In the workplace, this student becomes the professional who avoids long
reports, who misreads briefs, who struggles with contracts, and who cannot
efficiently process the volume of written information that modern professional
life demands. They are not unintelligent. They were never taught to read -
truly read - and nobody ever noticed, because nobody ever measured it directly.
Meanwhile, entire classrooms of students are reading textbooks,
answering questions about those textbooks, and being assessed on the content of
those textbooks - with nobody ever asking the prior question: do these
students actually have the reading skill to engage with this material
effectively in the first place?
So what should change?
Reading skill must be treated as a living, developing capability that
requires direct instruction, deliberate practice, and regular, independent
measurement throughout every stage of education - not just in the first years
of school.
All five dimensions of effective reading - comprehension verification,
speed alignment, information filtering, memory direction, and processing
regulation - must be taught explicitly, practiced purposefully, and assessed
directly.
Not as a test of what was read, but as a test of how it was read.
Every teacher, regardless of subject, must understand that they are also
a reading teacher - because if their students cannot effectively read the
material their subject demands, everything else they teach is built on sand.
And every institution must ask, honestly: are our students genuinely
reading - or are they merely moving their eyes across pages, completing a
performance of reading, while understanding accumulates slowly, partially, and
often not at all?
Reading is not the beginning of education.
It is the foundation beneath the beginning.
And we have been building on it without ever checking whether it is
solid.
"How is the modern education system cheating its own
students?" - Edition 12 of an ongoing series based on four decades of
research and observation. When did you last finish reading
something important and realize, honestly, that you had not truly understood
it? And when did anyone ever teach you what to do in that moment?
Read it on LinkedIn and subscribe to the newsletter.
Please do not include any spam links in the comment box.